|
One school of thought argues that human population size is the threat to biodiversity, and that unless something is done to control human numbers, piecemeal efforts to control habitat destruction and other causes of endangerment are doomed to fail. The graph of human population increase is certainly troubling, but it should also be recognized that population control mechanisms are not a complete answer. Money and a willingness to cooperate are also needed.
It has been said that conservation is a luxury that only rich nations can afford. Yet most of the world's biodiversity is concentrated in less-developed countries, the vast majority of which are not in an economic position to undertake effective conservation measures without outside help. The unavoidable conclusion is that wealthy countries (which are also the greatest consumers of natural resources) must be willing to share in the burden of providing a future for endangered species. But it is also obvious that the future of the world's biodiversity will only be assured when human needs in poorer countries have also been met. These are inseparable problems, and solving them -- together, in all senses of the word -- is
the greatest challenge we face at the dawn of the 21st century.
See
What Can
Be Done?
for more information.
|
