Young Naturalist Awards Back to 2006 Winners
Anastasia - Human Factor III: The Impact of a Boiling Water Nuclear Reactor


Introduction

Although my parents, my four brothers and I live in Pennsylvania, my mother is from New Jersey. Growing up, we continued my mother's custom of spending summers exploring the New Jersey shore. For four years I attended marine biology camp along New Jersey's Barnegat Bay and caught my mother's abiding passion for the Barnegat Bay Estuary and its surrounding habitats, including the magnificent and unique Pine Barrens, a forest like no other in the world.

Anastasia testing velocity in Cedar Creek
Anastasia testing velocity in Cedar Creek
This was the third year I had worked in the Barnegat Bay Estuary. During the first year, I studied whether the bay's water quality has declined over the past five decades, as the population around it has more than quadrupled. I collected and analyzed water samples for 11 indicators of water quality. I compared my data to 40 years of historical water-quality data from public databases. I concluded that there has been a decline in the bay's water quality.

The second year I studied the relationship between water quality and the presence of gram-negative pathogen-indicator bacteria. I cultured and counted bacteria, and prepared and studied microscopic slides of bacteria. I concluded that temperature, pH, nitrate-nitrogen, and dissolved oxygen affect bacteria growth in the bay, but salinity does not.

For each of these projects, I have benefited from people who were willing to talk to me about my projects and about Barnegat Bay. I also saw firsthand how careless and thoughtless some people are about the bay, treating it like a giant trashcan and being unmindful of how human activities impact the bay. I applied for and received two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-sponsored grants to write and illustrate a pamphlet about what people can do to conserve and protect the bay. I distributed copies of the pamphlet to every realtor on Long Beach Island. To date, over 12,000 pamphlets have been given to people who rent homes along Barnegat Bay.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Reactor
Oyster Creek Nuclear Reactor
As I traveled around the bay collecting samples, I learned there is a nuclear reactor operating in the Barnegat Estuary. I learned more about the reactor and how it was constructed and became increasingly intrigued about the impact of the reactor on the estuary.

This essay summarizes my study of the surface water in the intake and discharge creeks of the oldest of the nation's 103 operating commercial nuclear power plants, Oyster Creek. Oyster Creek came on line in 1969, five years before the United States established the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (History of Nuclear Energy, 2003). Oyster Creek is a boiling water reactor, one of 34 remaining in the United States. It is near Forked River, a sleepy town in the Pine Barrens, on the Barnegat Bay Estuary in New Jersey. The reactor sits at the artificially created confluence of the South Branch of Forked River (the intake creek) and Oyster Creek (the discharge creek). The reactor draws over 4.5 billion liters of water daily from Forked River Creek, heats the water, and discharges it into Oyster Creek (O'Malley, 2004). The Atlantic Ocean is 16.09 kilometers (10 miles) away.
Map showing the creeks and reactor
Map showing the creeks and reactor (Click to view)
I studied the reactor's impact on its intake and discharge creeks. I compared the two creeks' microbial communities, bacteria counts, and 11 water-quality parameters to those in a nearby, but not directly impacted, control creek. My field research was conducted from July through November 2005. I collected samples at three sites in each of three creeks in the Barnegat Bay Estuary. I am not aware of any prior study comparing these intake and discharge creeks.

My hypotheses were that the reactor affects the water quality in both the intake and discharge creeks; that the microbial communities in the intake and discharge creeks would be different than the one in the control creek; and that there would be fewer bacteria in the discharge creek.

The Oyster Creek Reactor

The Oyster Creek Reactor has transformed Oyster Creek and the South Branch of Forked River into part of the bay (Generic Environmental Impact, 1995). Forked River, the intake creek, and Oyster Creek, the discharge creek, are approximately 11.26 kilometers (7 miles) north of Cedar Creek, the control creek, along the 67.59-kilometer-long (42 mile) bay.

Forked River in its natural state
Forked River in its natural state
The original heads of Oyster Creek and Forked River were in New Jersey's Pine Barrens, a unique, 445,194 hectare (1.1 million acre) ecosystem of extensive pine forests fringed by salt water marshes (Jorgensen, 2001). These creeks were crystal-clear streams, brackish and tidal, each flowing east from the Pine Barrens into the bay. In what, at least in hindsight, seems a surprising decision, permission was given to dramatically alter those beautiful creeks to construct the Oyster Creek nuclear reactor. Beginning in 1964, the creeks were widened and deeply dredged, the direction of Forked River was completely reversed, and the creeks were joined at the reactor.

The crystal-clear water is gone, and the shallow, gently flowing creeks have disappeared. Both creeks now flow forcefully in opposite directions, controlled by the reactor, not the tides. The South Branch of Forked River flows west, daily moving over 4.5 billion liters (approximately 1.2 billion gallons) of salt water from the bay upstream into the power plant (O'Malley, 2004). Oyster Creek is now a one-way discharge creek flowing east (Generic Environmental Impact, 2005).

EcoPlate after inoculation
EcoPlate™ after inoculation
Analysis of microbial communities with EcoPlates™ assays

I used EcoPlate™ assays to study the microbial communities in each creek. Each EcoPlate™ (Biolog, CA) contains 96 wells: three replicates of 31 wells with seven different carbon substrates and three wells containing water. The carbon substrates are grouped into six categories: polymers, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, amino acids, amines, and phenolic compounds. I inoculated the EcoPlates™ with water, using a pipette. As the microbe community in the inoculum respires, a tetrazolium dye is reduced, the water color changes, and a purple formazan accumulates in the wells. The color change produces a "metabolic footprint" of the microbial community (Microbial Community Analysis, 2004). Because the microbial community is at the bottom of the food chain, changes in the community often predict overall environmental alteration (Microbial Analysis, 2004). I used a microplate reader to assess the optical densities, applied principal component analysis to the data, and created cluster graphs for each substrate.

Bacteria from Cedar Creek on MacConkey's Agar
Bacteria from Cedar Creek on MacConkey's Agar
Analysis of bacteria colonies with agar cultures

There are many types of agar. Selective media inhibit some bacteria from growing. Differential media allow most bacteria to grow, causing some bacteria to change color, which aids identification. Some media are both selective and differential. The agars I used in this study were Nutrient and MacConkey's. Nutrient is non-selective and grows both gram-negative and -positive bacteria. MacConkey's is selective and differential, grows only gram-negative bacteria, and colors some bacteria (Fankhauser, 2001).



SEARCH SITE MAP FAQ COPYRIGHT INFO PRIVACY POLICY ROSE CENTER CONTACT US SIGN UP FOR AMNH ENOTES