|
Interview: Paul W. Johnson, Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service |
|
Q: What is the importance of private lands for conserving
biodiversity?
PJ: If you look at where
our land is in this country, the vast majority of it is in private
hands. In fact, about 70% of the land in the contiguous 48 states is private land. If we're
going to look at biological diversity, look at habitat, that's
where the habitat is. For over a century now, we've been looking
at the public lands as the areas we want to save
and to preserve. But if you look at the broad array of
life and where it lives, it can't all be put in these sanctuaries,
if you will -- the public lands. It's good that we have them.
They're very important. But we must work with private landowners, as well, if we're truly
to have a geography of hope in this country. Fortunately, there's a lot of good going
on on private land today. We produce food and fiber on that
land, but we also produce water, we produce
wildlife.
Q: Bridges are needed between private and
public land. Are these kinds of things happening?
PJ: Yes, there are. There are a
number of wonderful organizations working to do that -- the Nature
Conservancy comes to mind. You
can't put all of nature in a sanctuary, and you've got to provide
buffers between our sanctuaries and the working land in America. We're working together
with a number of nonprofit organizations -- working together with
the fish and game agencies at both the state and federal levels to make sure that we have
buffers between intensively used land and those lands that we
are trying to keep in a pristine state.
Q: Can you comment on what this means for
an urban area like ours?
PJ: Well, New York City is a good example
of where you are connected with what goes on on the land further
away. Your water comes from the Catskills Mountains area and you're fortunate to have some of the best water in
the world. It comes through that land and into your reservoirs,
and then into the city, and you're able to drink it even without
filtration, up until this point.
If you're going to maintain good water,
then you have to work with people who live on the land.
In fact, New York City is doing that today. They're working with
dairy farmers to try to get them to use the land in a way where
it can not only provide milk and meat and farm products, but
also the land functions in a way to filter and to partition that
water. So when it's delivered to your reservoirs, it comes
to the people in New York City in good condition. Eight-eight percent
of all the precipitation in this country falls on private lands.
If we're going to have clean water, those lands have got
to be functioning well.
Q: How do you convince the skeptic?
PJ: You know, about 50 years ago the naturalist
Aldo Leopold, in talking to his students in a wildlife biology
class, made the statement that we should learn to read the land
-- learn to understand the land. And, when we do, he said, he
has no fear of what we will do to it.
I think that's really the key -- the
key is to understand land in the larger sense. Not just sand,
silts and clays that make up soil, but all the living system.
And when landowners learns about the land, generally they treat
it pretty well. I think very often many of our problems,
and much of the skepticism, comes from a lack of knowledge. That's
where a museum like this, and the programs that you have, really
do pay off.
Q: What are the primary threats to conserving biodiversity?
PJ: One, of course, is population, and the increase
in population and the pressure that puts on land. The second
is our urge to live so rich and so richly. I think that both
with population and consumption we've got to pay far more attention. It's possible
for us to live in the land, in a very healthy way. I think that,
again, it's very, very important that we continue the educational
programs, so that we understand how we are impacting land, and
try to adjust our way of living so that we can live in a more
sustainable way.
Q: What would we tell the general audience,
so they understood what that meant?
PJ: Well, it depends on the audience that
you're talking to, of course. One of the most important
parts about it would be to get people to take a look at their
home place themselves, and to assess where they
are. We don't do that very well. How many people in your community
really know the status and trends of the resources that are there?
The first thing is, again, to understand where we
are, where we've been, where we're going,
if we continue to live the way we do.
Q: Anything you want to add?
PJ: I usually say
to people: Thank you for the good work that you are doing. There
are numerous people who own land, who
live on that land, who work very hard. We tend to look at the problems; we tend
to look at where we're doing things that are not so good. But
there's lot of good going on, as well. And to everybody
who is out there trying -- whether it be in their suburban backyard,
or on a farm or a ranch -- thank you for the work that you are
doing.
The American Museum
of Natural History is a very important part of this educational
process. You have a terrific amount of knowledge here, and you
sponsor the continued acquisition of that knowledge. It's very,
very important that you not only have your doors open so people
can come here to learn about it, but that you go out with it,
as well. If you could take that knowledge, and take it out and share
it with people -- again, as Aldo Leopold said: I have no fear
of what you'll do with your land once you understand it. |
|