But before they are put to full use in the Arctic, where traditional ground-based field work can be especially challenging, a research team led by scientists at the American Museum of Natural History and the University of North Dakota wanted to know how wildlife react to this new method of data collection.
© Hudson Bay Project
“At the end of the day, UAS are tools,” said Andrew Barnas, a graduate student at the University of North Dakota and lead author of two studies that have been published in Polar Biology and
© Hudson Bay Project
To address this question, members of the Hudson Bay Project, a decades-long effort to monitor the environment in the western Hudson Bay that includes Museum biologists, conducted a series of UAS surveys of polar bears and nesting lesser snow geese in Wapusk National Park in Manitoba, Canada. The researchers randomly selected geese nests and then set up ground-based video surveillance cameras to monitor behavioral activity during UAS flyovers. During a different set of UAS flights, the scientists were able to observe three polar bears from varying heights. In both cases, the research team recorded the general vigilance displayed by the animals—behaviors such as scanning and head-cocking by the geese and “head-ups” by the bears.
© Hudson Bay Project
The researchers found that the animals were generally aware of the aircraft as it flew overhead, but they determined that the flights did not appear to adversely affect either bears or geese. The studies, published in
“Understanding how the populations and distributions of species change over time is pivotal to understanding the effects of climate change, which is especially pertinent in the Arctic,” said Robert Rockwell, an author on both papers and a research associate in the Museum’s Division of Vertebrate Zoology. “In contrast to other survey methods like mark-recapture, piloted aircraft, and remote sensing, UAS-based studies make more sense financially and logistically, and they also are more aligned with the cultural values of Arctic residents while cutting back on physical risks to the researchers.”